Our Opus 5.5 benchmarking versus Fable 5.1:
This is a dev post classified by Jev as Other (an opinion), kept by the Dev Radar because it carries real work, not commentary.
Our Opus 5.5 benchmarking versus Fable 5.1: - >2x cheaper for correct task 🔥 - slightly more reliable ✅ but 100% - 4x more hallucinations 😱 but only 2.8%
Posted by Patrick Moorhead (69k followers) 1 h ago · 11 likes · 1.4k views · view the original post on X. Kept by the Dev Radar as Other. Tools mentioned: Signal65 PINNACLE.
More dev work like this
- Here are some examples of the difference steps makes for image generation using… — @ItsmeAjayKV
- Stop searching for a Granola or a Wispr Flow alternative — @FluidVoiceApp
- Meet Occamy 1.0 APEX I MiniPlus V2.1 Abliterated GGUF. A custom quantized text… — @HuggingModels
- Our friend @spedemo has made a real Marvin, 3D printed, remote controlled, with voice… — @ashtom
- Meet the uncensored beast: Qwen3.8-35B-A3B-Distill-MTP-APEX-I-MiniPlus-V2.1-Abliterated.… — @HuggingModels
- CCTP is expanding beyond USDC. — @circle
- 🚨重磅！ MiMo-V2.6 刚登顶开源，小米AI负责人罗福莉直接预告 MiMo-V3换心脏！ — @NFT_Chen
- Run uncensored Bonsai 2 27B on 16 GB MacBook 💻 — @atomic_chat_hq
Every post is read and classified by Jev (TypeSafe): what it is, which market it belongs to, and whether the link is a real tool. 22.9k posts from 5k X accounts over the last 21 days, 2.7k tools, 12 markets. Collected every 5 minutes, fully re-ranked every hour — last update 2026-09-23 20:50 UTC. Full method.