We've been quietly extending our eslint rules to retroactively patch common agent…
This is a dev post classified by Jev as Testing & observability (a launch), kept by the Dev Radar because it carries real work, not commentary.
We've been quietly extending our eslint rules to retroactively patch common agent pitfalls. The goal is for it to be almost impossible to use Convex "wrong" but in the meantime a few additional guardrails go a long way.
Posted by James Cowling (13.8k followers) 2 days ago · 83 likes · 3.9k views · view the original post on X. Kept by the Dev Radar as Testing & observability.
More dev work like this
- Tired of an overwhelming volume of signals without clarity on which ones truly matter?… — @CDWCorp
- time to run some sonnet 5.2 (?) tests — @robinebers
- Don’t mind me just on the go being able to test mobile dev remotely from my phone 😎 — @jullerino
- What does observability look like when a judgment costs nothing? — @hugorcd
- When agent traces turn into a debugging pile, this repo gives you a place to inspect them. — @DanKornas
- I’m glad @strawgate's standards for coffee are lower than his standards for code review… — @kayvz
- Gitar finds bugs, fixes them under your team's rules, and verifies every fix by running… — @SonarSource
- One AI agent is easy to monitor. 1,000 agents running across your org? Different problem. — @AlphaSignalAI
Every post is read and classified by Jev (TypeSafe): what it is, which market it belongs to, and whether the link is a real tool. 17k posts from 4.9k X accounts over the last 21 days, 1.9k tools, 12 markets. Collected every 5 minutes, fully re-ranked every hour — last update 2026-09-20 22:16 UTC. Full method.